WHAT ATTRACTED YOUR ATTENTION TODAY?

[Cathy]

That is shocking. Were they taking DNA Samples in 2003?

[Stanley]

I don't know Cathy. From the article it seems as though the problem was that the investigators had made assumptions that were wrong.....

[Cathy]

Australia has 46 days of National Fuel Supply left.

[Stanley]

I see they're regretting letting the infrastructure of oil refineries to drop back to only two........

[Stanley]

THIS sign of the times caught my eye.....
More than one in three young men in the UK were living with their parents in 2025, up from 26% in 2000, according to data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The increase is being driven by high renting costs and rising house prices, recent studies suggest. The data shows 35% of young men aged 20-35 were living with their parents - more than young women (22%), although the rate in both groups has been increasing. In separate research, the statistics body found the rising cost of living was the most important issue facing adults, above the NHS and the economy in general.
I believe that this figure will rise as the pressures from unemployment worsen the situation..... It's possibly the most serious change in society for generations.....

[Stanley]

THIS report caught my eye.....
1 hour ago
Throughout US President Donald Trump's second term in office, traders have been betting millions of dollars just before he makes major announcements. The BBC has examined trade volume data on several financial markets and matched them to some of the president's most significant market-moving statements. It found a consistent pattern of spikes just hours, or sometimes minutes, before a social media post or media interview was made public. Some analysts say it bears the hallmarks of illegal insider trading, whereby bets are made by people based on information that is not available to the general public. Others say the picture is more complicated and that some traders have become more adept at anticipating the president's interventions. Here are five of the most significant examples. (read on....)
The question that surfaces in my mind is "Would a veteran chancer Like Trump be able to resist the chance of a quick buck?"

[Stanley]

See THIS BBC report on Starmer's defence yesterday in Parliament.
7 hours ago
Sir Keir Starmer has been in the Commons again, defending his actions over the appointment of Lord Mandelson as ambassador to the US. It comes after it emerged the peer was given security clearance for the role in January 2025, against the recommendation of officials who vetted him. He formally took up the role the following month, and was sacked seven months later over his ties to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. he PM blamed the Foreign Office The prime minister had many angry words for the Foreign Office, the department that authorised Lord Mandelson's clearance despite the vetting concerns from security officials. He said the department's officials should have informed him at the time - and then missed "repeated occasions" afterwards to make him aware, including when the UK's then former top civil servant investigated Lord Mandelson's sacking last year. The repeated failure to divulge the result of Lord Mandelson's vetting process was "incredible", "staggering" and "astonishing", the prime minister said. And he went further, saying there had also been a "deliberate decision" to withhold information about the vetting process from MPs who had previously conducted an inquiry into Lord Mandelson's sacking. e argued the vetting result could have been shared The vetting process involves asking applicants deliberately intrusive questions about things such as their finances, sexual history, health and family. Sir Keir said he accepted that information gathered during this process - including from two interviews held with Lord Mandelson - should not be divulged. But he added that, in his opinion, there was no reason why the overall vetting recommendation could not have been shared with him. He suggested that this was a key point of difference between him and Sir Olly Robbins, the former top civil servant at the Foreign Office at the time, who was effectively sacked last week. "He took the view this process did not allow him to disclose to me the recommendation," the prime minister said, whilst adding that he "should have provided this information to me". Sir Olly is due to give his side of the story on Tuesday when he appears before a Commons committee - and his response to this point will be closely watched. He denied misleading Parliament
A key accusation from opposition parties is that Sir Keir misled MPs last year when he told the Commons that "full due process" had been followed during Lord Mandelson's appointment. This is politically significant - because the government rulebook says ministers should not "knowingly mislead" Parliament. Asked whether he might have inadvertently misled the Commons about what happened, he replied "no". He said he accepted that MPs, like him, should have been given more information, but added: "I did not mislead the House". He has ordered (another) security review. The prime minister revealed that he has ordered a review of "any security concerns raised" during Lord Mandelson's time as ambassador. Sir Keir confirmed that the peer had access to the highest level of secret material during his time in Washington. He told MPs the review would be conducted by the Government Security Group, a unit within the Cabinet Office. This is separate to another review, being led by retired judge Sir Adrian Fulford, into the wider national security vetting system.

[Cathy]

It’s Postman Pete’s Birthday .
.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY POSTMAN PETE
.
Have A Great Day .

[Stanley]

Many of them Pete!

[Stanley]

THIS caught my eye....
2 hours ago
K-pop mogul Bang Si-hyuk, the man who created supergroup BTS, could be arrested on charges of fraudulent trading before his $7.3bn company went public. South Korean police have asked prosecutors to request a court warrant over accusations that he misled investors in 2019, by claiming a public listing for his conglomerate Hybe was not likely, while secretly preparing for it. Hybe debuted on South Korea's Kospi bourse in October 2020, and police allege Bang pocketed some 200bn won ($136m; £101m) as a result. He denies the allegations. The case against Bang is long-running and has seen raids at Hybe's headquarters, some of his assets frozen and calls for him to step down as company chairman. The 53-year-old has maintained that his actions were above board. He has been banned from travelling abroad since August while the investigation is carried out. The request for a warrant comes weeks after BTS - Hybe's crown jewel and the reason for its immense success - kicked off a comeback world tour following a hiatus of nearly four years. Industry watchers estimate that Hybe stands to make more than $1bn from the sold-out tour, which will take the group to 34 cities across the world. The company's shares hit a four-year high when BTS announced their world tour in January, adding over 1 trillion won to its market value. Bang, who was instrumental in taking the group global, said in a recent interview with Billboard that BTS had become like a "tourist attraction... widely recognised and embraced by the global public". Under South Korean law, those convicted of making 5bn won or more in illicit proceeds face between five years in jail and a life sentence.
I think what fascinates me about this report is the fact that it is so far removed from my world. I find it incredible......

[Stanley]

An engineer's kitchen...

[Whyperion]

Australia has 46 days of National Fuel Supply left.

Solar is fairly infinite

[Cathy]

Our PM has negotiated another 300 million litres of fuel, since then.

[Stanley]

THIS caught my eye this morning....
Updated 10 minutes ago
US Navy Secretary John Phelan is leaving the Trump administration, the Pentagon announced on Wednesday. His departure will be "effective immediately", Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a social media post. Navy Undersecretary Hung Cao will serve as acting secretary, Parnell added. Phelan is the latest high-ranking military leader to leave the administration in recent months. His departure comes amid the US-Israel war with Iran and the continued US blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. "On behalf of the Secretary of War and Deputy Secretary of War, we are grateful to Secretary Phelan for his service to the Department and the United States Navy," Parnell wrote. "We wish him well in his future endeavors." The Navy did not provide a reason for Phelan's departure. It comes just weeks after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth asked Army Chief of Staff Randy George to step down from his post. Two other army officials, Gen David Hodne and Maj Gen William Green, have also been removed from their roles recently. Since entering the Pentagon, Hegseth has fired more than a dozen senior military officers, including the chief of naval operations and the Air Force's vice-chief of staff. Phelan, a civilian who had not previously served in the military, was sworn in as Secretary of the Navy in March 2025 after being nominated by President Donald Trump in 2024.
Not much job security in the Trump administration......

[Big Kev]

My youngest received a penalty charge notice, for not paying the London ULEZ charge, through the post today. Fortunately he has CCTV images of him, and his car, arriving at work in York at the same time. It seems his registration number has been cloned.

[Stanley]

As if there weren't enough disadvantages to owning a car! I feel for him.

THIS caught my attention.....
Sovereignty of the Falkland Islands "rests with the UK", Downing Street has said, following a report the US could review its position on Britain's claim to the territory. An internal Pentagon email reported by Reuters suggested the US was considering options to punish Nato allies it believed had failed to support its war on Iran. The options discussed also included seeking Spain's suspension from Nato over its opposition to the war. BBC News has not been able to review the email. A Pentagon spokesperson did not comment on the email's existence, but said it would "ensure that the president has credible options to ensure that our allies are no longer a paper tiger and instead do their part". "As President [Donald] Trump has said, despite everything that the United States has done for our Nato allies, they were not there for us," the spokesperson added. The Falkland Islands, a British overseas territory in the south-west Atlantic Ocean, remain the subject of a sovereignty dispute between Britain and Argentina. Asked about the report, a No 10 spokesman on Friday said: "The Falkland Islands have previously voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory, and we've always stood behind the islanders' right to self-determination and the fact that sovereignty rests with the UK." The prime minister's official spokesman also said the government "could not be clearer about the UK's position", and that "sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders' right to self-determination is paramount". He continued: "We've expressed this position previously clearly and consistently to successive US administrations and nothing is going to change that." Former Labour security minister Lord West BBC Radio 4's The World Tonight programme the Pentagon leak on the Falklands was "quite extraordinary" and showed "a lack of understanding". Lord West, who was an officer commanding HMS Ardent during the Falklands War, went on to describe US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth as "thick" and accused him of having a total lack of understanding about Nato. "Hegseth talks about the fact that Nato's never done anything for America, America's done so much for Nato, but the only time that Article 5 was invoked was by Nato and it was to defend the United States," he said. "I'm afraid he's thick actually, and he doesn't seem to have a very good knowledge of a lot of these things, but to say that is stupid." Under Nato's Article 5, an armed attack against one or more members is considered an attack against all, and in response each other member would take "such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area". The only time Article 5 has been invoked was after the 9/11 attacks on the US in 2001. Previous US administrations have formally recognised the UK's de facto administration of the islands, but have not taken a formal position regarding sovereignty. "The Falkland Islands has complete confidence in the commitment made by the UK government to uphold and defend our right of self-determination," the islands' government said in a statement.
Not a lot of signs of any 'special relationship'........

[Cathy]

Australia and New Zealand.
.
Today is the 111th ANZAC DAY .
For all Veterans. Lest We Forget.
.
.

[Stanley]

XXX

[PanBiker]

Indeed Cathy.