OneGuyFromBarlick

Hurrah!

It seems to be coming and going at the moment!

Should be there now.

Well done you two!

Or perhaps not

Still got a tick rather than the red exclamation mark and I get on no problem.

I seem to be missing some of that conversation (just before you started cheering).
If it's of any interest, Firefox asked me to renew my instruction to ignore the dangers of the site this morning when I logged on. The first time it has done that since the difficulty first arose so something must have disturbed the ethos!

I seem to have worked around the issue, there is a reissued SSL certificate in place securing the domain.

I’m still just getting the blue question mark instead of the pic on mystery objects.

Tried Firefox but still the same.

Gloria wrote: ↑01 May 2025, 07:29 Tried Firefox but still the same.

Can you check Mystery Objects for me please?

Still the same

Gloria wrote: ↑01 May 2025, 07:52 Still the same

Which browser? Chrome or Firefox?

It’s the same on both.

The change is that Firefox is asking me to take the advanced option of ignoring the warning every time I log in....
I am leaving the mystery object up until things get back to normal.

Meanwhile in Barlick I have3 noted that Keenan's estate agents have given up their corner shop and no longer exist. That didn't last long....,

There should no longer be a warning when opening the site, there is a new SSL cert in place but it has left an issue with linking to gallery images. This is due to limitations on the new cert but there is a workaround. The usual method, to link to a gallery image, is to use the Image URL. For now if you can use the Image BBCode gallery images will be visible.
I will look further into adding the wildcard option to the SSL certificate.

Hopefully there'll be a few more accessing the site now

How come Stanley is seeing his own images when the rest of us can't? Firefox makes no difference.

Wendyf wrote: ↑01 May 2025, 13:23 How come Stanley is seeing his own images when the rest of us can't? Firefox makes no difference.

I don't know, I can't see mine when using the Image-url from the gallery...

Could it be that Stanley uses Linux?

Wendyf wrote: ↑01 May 2025, 14:21 Could it be that Stanley uses Linux?

We need Stanley to confirm he can see his own images in his posts, unless he already has and I've missed it

Big Kev wrote: ↑01 May 2025, 14:49

Wendyf wrote: ↑01 May 2025, 14:21 Could it be that Stanley uses Linux?

We need Stanley to confirm he can see his own images in his posts, unless he already has and I've missed it

I hadn't thought of that.

I can see all images current and historic. Ask Tizer if it's the same for him, I think he uses Firefox as well and is certainly a Linux user.

Margaret has just landed in Bali for a holiday and is going for lunch..... What unadventurous lives most of us lead!

Users will be able to see the images in the Gallery but not in posts where the full URL has been used, there is no certificate in place to support this yet although it should have been automatic.

The LTP2013 is different as all the images were embedded before the project was ripped into a single entity. It does not rely on live links to the Gallery which I will remind everyone should not be working on this version of the site or any later version to be honest. It works on a wing and a prayer and has done for the last few years. Sooner or later it will fall over unless major updates are done to the code.