Page 1 of 1

BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 07:07
by Stanley
BARLICK OUT OF STEP

For the first 80 years of the 19th century the textile industry in Barlick was dominated by two partnerships, the Slater Brothers at Clough Mill and William Bracewell who joined in the bonanza in 1846 when he built first Butts mill and then, in 1853, Wellhouse. By 1885 his enterpriseswere the biggest employers in the town.
The Slater Brothers demonstrated original thinking and independence from the start. Their policy was to let space out to other manufacturers so they could get a start in the industry. During the Cotton Famine of the 1860s they diversified into wool and even hank dying of yarns to try to keep going during those difficult years. Bracewell on the other hand stuck to his original model of vertical operation, spinning and weaving at both mills and refusing to let space to others who he saw as rivals. Billycock Bracewell was a ruthless business man and his aim was total domination, he even forced his cousins out of business at Old Coates. He died in 1885 and by then his business was in bad shape, over-borrowed and still spinning, he was completely out of touch with modern developments in the industry in Lancashire which had moved on, adopted specialised weaving, and was booming. Barlick was looking old fashioned and with both his mills closed and unemployment in the town forcing a mass migration of workers to Colne and further afield grass grew on the streets according to one report.
However, all was not lost. The independent manufacturers who had been building their capital and resources at Clough and other public spirited men who stood to lose by the recession got together and decided to do something about it. It's significant that the first public meeting to address this matter was chaired by the local parson and attended by all the prominent business men in the town. Politics had nothing to do with this, this was self help, the aim was to survive. The upshot was the formation of the Calf Hall Shed Company which by 1903 had bought both Butts and Wellhouse, built a new shed at Calf Hall and specialised in weaving using the most modern plant. The company was not a manufacturer, it operated mills and let space to independent tenants on a Room and Power basis. Another shed company was formed and built Long Ing Shed at the same time.
This totally new business model was successful to the extent that by the early years of the 20th century tenants in the shed companies had made enough capital to build their own mills and the town boomed until the start of the Great War. I'm not suggesting that this was totally altruistic, these men didn't see themselves as serving the public but in effect this was what was happening. Barlick joined the party late but by its own efforts soon overtook rival towns in terms of concentration of looms per capita. Model Lodging houses had to be built to accommodate itinerant weavers who came in for the work.

Image

Butts, Bracewell's first mill built in 1846.

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 07:09
by Stanley
I was attacked in the letters column of the BET this week.... Here's my reply

LETTER TO THE EDITOR 23/10/15

I read Robin Higgins letter headed 'Just read the Bible' in Reader's Views last week. To describe what I wrote as “Stanley Graham's anti-Catholic tirade” is grossly unfair. If he reads the piece again with more care he will see that this was not my view but that of the people I was writing about who were, and I quote directly, '...under the influence of the Reformation in Europe'.
My evidence is gained from careful reading of the work of far better scholars than I and they are, without exception, supportive of my version of religious developments in that era. The fact that I reported, that the Catholic Church exploited selective quotations from the Bible and extended this to the practice of selling 'get out of gaol free' Indulgences for their own purposes is a historical fact and cannot by any stretch of the imagination be ascribed to the reporters 'tirade'.

Stanley Graham
10 East Hill Street
Barnoldswick.

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 12:11
by Moh
Some people seem to have nothing to do but compose letters to the papers, always the same people - sad people!!

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 12:42
by Tripps
Moh wrote:Some people seem to have nothing to do but compose letters to the papers, always the same people - sad people!!
Other seem satisfied to get things off their chest by joining a web site such as this one. :smile: Not such a wide audience of course - I reckon (this is probably where I join the sad people), there have been only 34 individual posters in the last two months . I appreciate there are more readers than that, but It's still a very 'niche market'.

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 18:24
by plaques
Stanley wrote:Catholic Church exploited selective quotations from the Bible
Treading on dangerous ground here. For some unknown reason if God or the Bible are brought into the discussion as an overriding fact all previous reason and logic are trumped. A definite ‘go to jail’ card. “Because it/they say so” is used to counter all further challenges. As Karen Armstrong said in her book ‘Religion is about other people telling you what to do’. Most people are happy to leave it at that but some may continue citing that there are things around us where there is no definitive scientific answer. Rather than say ‘I don’t know’ their answer usually involves God or God’s will’. The last elements requiring a ‘faith’ that is equally nonspecific. On the odd occasion where a debate is carried out on an equal footing as per Richard Dawkins V The leading Church authorities in England the end result was summarised as ‘ Lions five, Christians nil’.

This posting is not intended to upset or inflame those who get comfort or support from their beliefs. Its just one person’s view.

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 02:34
by Stanley
You're right P. The mistake Mr Higgins made was that he shot the messenger. One of the books I've read is Karen Armstrong's, perhaps Robin Higgins should do the same....
David, you're right, not many of us post regularly but what a lovely bunch of people!

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 06 Feb 2022, 05:08
by Stanley
Bumped and image restored.
Just for the record, since then I have read even more theology and my views on the Church of Rome are not changed.

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 06 Feb 2022, 08:45
by Gloria
What an ornate building that is.

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 07 Feb 2022, 03:29
by Stanley
Was Gloria, here's the same scene today.

Image

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 07 Feb 2022, 08:23
by Gloria
Sad that’s gone.

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 11 Jul 2023, 03:59
by Stanley
Bumped again. Disregarding the religious matters, it's a good history of the beginning of the modern industry.....

Re: BARLICK OUT OF STEP

Posted: 26 Jan 2025, 04:10
by Stanley
And that view hasn't changed..... :good: