Page 1 of 1

HOUSING 03

Posted: 09 Sep 2016, 06:26
by Stanley
HOUSING 03

Before we plunge into the question of the slums we should take note of a different solution to rational housing that sprang up from an unlikely source in the early 19th century.
In 1825 the government was getting very worried about the rising power of organised labour and passed the Combination Act which prohibited workers from 'combining' in trade unions. This prohibition wasn't lifted until about 1870 and the reaction of the men who had been affected by this was to find another way of 'combining' which was within the law. Taking their cue from organisations like the Masons they formed 'Friendly Societies', often using regalia and rituals, and used member's subscriptions to fund death, sickness and unemployment benefits. This is the origin of organisations like the Buffaloes, the Lions and the Free Foresters.
As time went on and some of them built up respectable funds of capital they branched out into building houses for rent. In Barlick the Barnoldswick Friendly Society built Club Row at Townhead in 1828 and the Foresters built Forester's Buildings on Skipton Road. At Club Row they included a shop at the end of the row and the cottages were a cut above a normal terraced house. In the 1960s they were scheduled for demolition but survived and are now very desirable properties. My mate Ernie Roberts bought one of them for £500 on rental purchase (another lost source of funding), the low price reflecting the gamble he was taking. The Friendly Societies which built for rent were the forerunners of the modern building societies.
This activity was in line with a growing altruistic movement which recognised the dire condition of much of the poorest housing stock. The earliest example of a practical effort to improve this situation was Robert Dale's New Lanark mill and housing complex in Scotland in 1786. Shortly afterwards the Gregs at Quarry Bank Mill, Styal in Cheshire followed suit. By 1850 Titus Salt was building Saltaire, the Cadbury family followed at Birmingham with Bournville in 1893 and Levers built Port Sunlight. All these developments were a product of a wider movement to 'improve' artisan's cottages. Architects produced designs for the first 'ideal homes'.
This was all well and good but did nothing to improve the vast majority of workers homes, jerry built by speculators for rental income, horribly overcrowded and insanitary. Ironically it was the latter that triggered improvement. In 1854 John Snow, a doctor in London, identified water polluted by human waste as the origin of an outbreak of Cholera in the Soho slums and this triggered efforts to improve water and sanitation services. Ironically the main opponents were the better off living in the suburbs who saw expenditure on the living conditions of the poor as 'Municipal Socialism'. Fortunately the pioneering journal the Morning Chronicle whose correspondent Henry Mayhew had been focussing on the condition of the poor took up the good doctor's discovery and common sense prevailed. 'Slum housing' was targeted for improvement.

Image

Club Row at Townhead built in 1828 by the Barnoldswick Friendly Society.

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 09 Sep 2016, 07:28
by David Whipp
I always trip up over 'Foresters' Buildings' or 'Forester's Buildings'... please pardon pedantry!

(and alliteration...)

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 09 Sep 2016, 08:15
by plaques
Probably most towns have similar 'Society' buildings but they go unnoticed. Here is a row of terraced houses on Colne Rd Brierfield.
PB290123AD.jpg

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 10 Sep 2016, 04:19
by Stanley
Nice example P!

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 23 Mar 2022, 05:07
by Stanley
Bumped and image restored.....

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 23 Mar 2022, 08:34
by Gloria
Correct me if I am wrong, but, a lot of mill owners built rows of terraced housing which they rented to their employees, the local shops were owned by the mill owners, and the wages paid in tokens which could only be exchanged in their shops. Thereby having a captured work force.

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 23 Mar 2022, 08:59
by Big Kev
I became a member of the Anglo Saxons Friendly Society, Gravesend, in 1978. It's still going strong and the annual subscription remains unchanged.

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 23 Mar 2022, 09:00
by plaques
Exactly right Gloria. The Dugdale's of Lowerhouse Mills made it a condition that the workers bought from their shops. The only sign of 'charity' towards the workers they house was when they 'paid' a rent, to themselves of course, of £10 so that they could vote for Robert Shaw. Burnley's first MP who just happened to be married to on of Dugdale's family. Actually Shaw himself was a very good manager and most of the workers enjoyed better conditions that most other weavers.

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 23 Mar 2022, 09:22
by Stanley
'Bucket Shops'. No sign of them in Barlick. But you're right Gloria, it was a common practice. Usually called 'The Truck System'. See THIS Wikipedia article.....

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 23 Mar 2022, 09:36
by Gloria
Suppose it could be classed as a version of slave labour, with having nearly total domination over the workforce. The only exception being, the mill workers could leave, but would have nothing, whereas slaves couldn’t leave and were owned.

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 24 Mar 2022, 03:42
by Stanley
Same level of coercion as a tied cottage Gloria.

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 27 Oct 2023, 03:36
by Stanley
More essential history bumped.....

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 27 Oct 2023, 07:39
by Gloria
We’ve pretty much had this conversation again in Housing 2, I’d forgotten 🫣

Re: HOUSING 03

Posted: 19 May 2025, 04:15
by Stanley
A good reason for repeating them Gloria. :good: