I've just been watching the Olympic ganes from Paris. Here are a few random thoughts.
It's been a bit disappointing - I think the coverage has been run by non British interests - probably French. They seem more interested in the winner of an event rather than the bronze medal British competitor.
Are the interviewers paid by the word or the minute?- certainly not by the relevance of their questions. Gold medal performances for interviews by Hazel Irvine. Silver to Clare Balding.
After all the fuss about XY chromosones - I still haven't seen the final of the ladies welterweight boxing.
Some of the events looked more like a computer game than an actual computer game. e.g Skateboarding.
Tae Kwondo is a boring load of rubbish, and Judo at this level comes prety close too. Should we really give a medal for kicking someone in the head? Perhaps GMP should enter a team?
Breaking - a new event was even more amazing than I could have imagined. Don't ring us - we'll ring you.
Most events are getting more freakish as winning margins reduce to milimetres, and miliseconds. The dedication training, and preparation for the events must come close to child abuse.
I read that having two white and two black athletes in the relay final was evidence of diversity in action. No one mentioned that there not a single black swimmer in the team. perhaps in both cases, the best person was chosen for the team?
What a contrast between the Chinese weightlifting winner and their gymnasts. Perhaps they should swap over - that would be amusing.
I tried to like the cycling, but if anyone other than the commentator understood what went on the final of the 'Omnium' I'll plait treacle.
Here's how it uses to be - a long time ago- when wheels had spokes and you went home if it rained -at Fallowfield .
fallowfield.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.